U.S. judge blocks Trump from sending California National Guard to Portland for now

U.S. judge blocks Trump from sending California National Guard to Portland for now


A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Donald Trump’s administration from sending some 200 federalized California National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, a setback for the president as he seeks to dispatch the military to cities over the objections of their Democratic leaders.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut followed a joint lawsuit by California and Oregon seeking to block the extraordinary move that drew vehement criticism from both states’ governors. A day earlier, Immergut temporarily blocked Trump from deploying 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, citing a lack of evidence that recent protests necessitated the move.

“How could bringing in federalized National Guard from California not be in direct contravention of the (decision) I issued yesterday?,” Immergut asked a Trump administration lawyer during a hearing on Sunday night.

Immergut’s ruling on Sunday means the Trump administration would be blocked from sending the California troops to Portland while the lawsuit plays out.

There was no immediate comment from the White House or from the Pentagon on the judge’s order.

The Pentagon said earlier on Sunday it was sending 200 California National Guard troops to Oregon to “support U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal personnel performing official duties, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property.”

National Guard troops are state-based militia forces that answer to their governors except when called into federal service. Trump has said their deployment in Portland is necessary to respond to protests at an immigration facility in the city.

California Governor Gavin Newsom said before the judge’s order that the troops were already on their way to Portland.

“This is a breathtaking abuse of the law and power. The Trump Administration is unapologetically attacking the rule of law itself,” Newsom said in a post on X.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from using U.S. troops in California to fight crime on September 2, but that ruling is on hold while the administration appeals. As a result, the Guard troops headed to Oregon remain federalized and under Trump’s command.

LOCAL OBJECTIONS

The Oregon deployment is the latest example of Trump’s expanding use of the U.S. military in his second term, which has included deploying troops along the U.S. border and ordering them to kill suspected drug traffickers on boats off Venezuela.

National Guard troops have been deployed to police Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., and Trump has said he would send troops to several other cities, regardless of objections from local government officials.

On Sunday, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat, said Trump was ordering 400 members of the Texas National Guard to Illinois, Oregon and other cities. Pritzker called on the Texas governor to refuse to coordinate with the order.

Oregon and Portland challenged Trump’s efforts to federalize its National Guard, saying Trump was exaggerating the threat of protests against his immigration policies to justify illegally seizing control of state units.

They argued that Trump’s deployment violated several federal laws and the state’s sovereign right to police its own citizens.

Speaking to reporters at the White House earlier on Sunday, Trump repeated his characterization of Portland as a city overrun by lawlessness. “You have agitators, insurrectionists,” he said.

Immergut, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, said in her ruling on Saturday that although the president must be given “a great level of deference” in military decisions, he cannot ignore the facts on the ground.

Accepting Trump’s legal arguments would mean that he could “send military troops virtually anywhere at any time” and “risk blurring the line between civil and military federal power – to the detriment of this nation,” she added.

Trump said on Sunday he did not know which judge issued Saturday’s ruling, but that he was not “served well” by those who advised him to make the appointment in his first term. “That judge ought to be ashamed of himself,” Trump said of Immergut, mistaking her gender.

The Trump administration on Sunday appealed Immergut’s decision on the Oregon troops, arguing that the Supreme Court decided 200 years ago that Congress gave the decision on whether to call up National Guard troops to the president.



Source

Mamdani’s inauguration: New York, New Year, new mayor
Politics

Mamdani’s inauguration: New York, New Year, new mayor

Zohran Mamdani is sworn in as New York City’s 112th mayor by New York Attorney General Letitia James, left, alongside his wife Rama Duwaji, right, in the former City Hall subway station on January 1, 2026 in New York City. Pool | Getty Images News | Getty Images Zohran Mamdani was sworn in as New […]

Read More
Trump’s first vetoes of his second term hit bipartisan infrastructure projects, draw accusations of retribution
Politics

Trump’s first vetoes of his second term hit bipartisan infrastructure projects, draw accusations of retribution

President Donald Trump issued the first vetoes of his second term Tuesday, blocking bills that would support a pair of bipartisan infrastructure projects in Colorado and Florida.  Trump’s veto of the Colorado bill, the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act, which Congress unanimously approved earlier in December, enraged the state’s lawmakers. The bill would reduce […]

Read More
Congressional Republicans call on Tim Walz to testify on Minnesota fraud scandal
Politics

Congressional Republicans call on Tim Walz to testify on Minnesota fraud scandal

Congressional Republicans on Wednesday called Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz to testify amid an ongoing social services fraud scandal, as the White House signaled it could expand its investigations into other blue states. A day after the Trump administration said it would freeze hundreds of millions of dollars of child care funds to Minnesota, House Oversight […]

Read More