Trump administration sued over Jan. 6 information requests, health data scrubbing

Trump administration sued over Jan. 6 information requests, health data scrubbing


The Trump administration was sued Tuesday in separate civil complaints challenging a request for information about FBI employees who worked on cases involving President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, and the removal of data from federal health agency websites.

The lawsuits are the latest in a growing number of legal salvos seeking to block — or slow down — the rapid-fire series of executive actions Trump and his allies have taken since he returned to the White House on Jan. 20.

Both cases were filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

The first case, a class-action complaint, was filed by a group of nine unidentified FBI agents and employees of the agency against the Department of Justice.

That suit seeks to block the publication or dissemination of information in surveys the plaintiffs or their supervisors have been ordered to fill out identifying “their specific role” in cases involving the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot criminal cases, and the criminal prosecution of Trump himself for retaining classified records after leaving the White House in early 2021.

The suit says that the survey was issued “to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer adverse employment action.”

“Upon returning to the Presidency, Mr. Trump has ordered the DOJ to conduct a review and purge of FBI personnel involved in these investigations and prosecutions,” the suit says.

“This directive is unlawful and retaliatory, and violates the Civil Service Reform Act.”

The suit says the plaintiffs “reasonably fear that all or parts” of a list of FBI agents who worked on the Jan. 6 and Trump cases “might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now-pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.”

The complaint says that some of the plaintiffs’ personal information “has already been posted by Jan. 6 convicted felons on ‘dark websites.’ “

CNBC has requested comment from the DOJ on the suit.

The second lawsuit was filed by the advocacy group Doctors for America against the Office of Personnel Management, the Health and Human Services Department, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration.

That complaint challenges the abrupt removal last Friday from CDC and FDA websites “a broad range of health-related data and other information.”

The suit says that data is regularly used by “health professionals to diagnose and treat patients and by researchers to advance public health, including through clinical trials meant to establish the safety and efficacy of medical products.”

The removal of the data came two days after Charles Ezell, OPM’s acting director, issued a memo that ordered federal agency heads to “terminate” programs “that promote or inculcate gender ideology” and remove all websites, social media accounts and other media that have that goal.

Ezell’s order came more than a week after Trump signed an executive order titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.”

The suit says that before that unannounced removal, the datasets had been on the websites for years.

Their removal “creates a dangerous gap in the scientific data available to monitor and respond to disease outbreaks, deprives physicians of resources that guide clinical practice, and takes away key resources for communicating and engaging with patients,” the suit says.

The CDC removed web pages for its Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance System, pages devoted to data on Adolescent and School Health,” as well as pages for “The Social Vulnerability Index” and “The Environmental Justice Index,” according to the suit.

Also removed was a report and web pages related to HIV infections, the complaint says.

The FDA removed several pages, including one titled “Study of Sex Differences in the Clinical Evaluation
of Medical Products,” and another titled “Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of
Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies.”

“The decisions by CDC, FDA, and HHS to remove the webpages and datasets contradict their stated missions and are causing and will cause substantial harm to Plaintiff and its members, as well as other physicians, researchers, and patients who rely on the removed webpages and datasets,” the suit says.

Spokespeople for OPM and CDC declined to comment on the lawsuit. The media affairs offices of HHS and FDA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.



Source

Epstein files: Senators call for audit into DOJ’s release
Politics

Epstein files: Senators call for audit into DOJ’s release

A bipartisan group of Senators on Wednesday called for an audit into the Department of Justice’s handling of the files related to the disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a letter to DOJ Acting Inspector General Dan Berthiaume, a group of 12 senators said the DOJ had violated a law — dubbed the Epstein Files […]

Read More
Libyan army’s chief dies in plane crash in Turkey
Politics

Libyan army’s chief dies in plane crash in Turkey

Turkish Defence Minister Yasar Guler meets with Libya’s army chief of staff Mohammed Ali Ahmed Al-Haddad in Ankara, Turkey, December 23, 2025. Defence Ministry | Via Reuters The Libyan army’s chief of staff, Mohammed Ali Ahmed Al-Haddad, died in a plane crash on Tuesday after leaving Turkey’s capital Ankara, the prime minister of Libya’s internationally […]

Read More
Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to send National Guard to Chicago
Politics

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to send National Guard to Chicago

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dealt a rare blow to President Donald Trump by rejecting his bid to overrule a lower court order and allow the deployment of National Guard troops to the Chicago area over the objections of local and state leaders. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the case […]

Read More