Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to New York vaccine mandate for health care workers

Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to New York vaccine mandate for health care workers


Health care workers protest against being forced to get the Covid-19 vaccine on August 27, 2021, outside the New York State Office Building in Hauppauge, New York.

Alejandra Villa Loarca | Newsday | Getty Images

The Supreme Court declined Thursday to take up a legal challenge brought by health care workers in New York who oppose the state’s vaccine mandate on religious grounds.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch said the court should have taken the case. 

When the requirement was first imposed last August as a way to help prevent the spread of the latest Covid variant, it allowed exceptions based on medical reasons or religious objections. But the religious exemption was later removed.  

Gov. Kathy Hochul, who is Roman Catholic, said she was not aware of any “sanctioned religious objection from any organized religion” and that religious leaders including the Pope were encouraging people to get vaccinated.

Sixteen health care workers sued, saying they had religious objections because fetal cell lines were involved in the testing, development, or production of Covid vaccines. They said the mandate violated their religious freedom because it allowed others who were unvaccinated to continue working. 

But lawyers for the state said the Covid mandate was similar to longstanding rules requiring health care workers to be vaccinated against measles and rubella. Those requirements, too, allow exemptions only for medical reasons. Laboratory-grown stem cells, which derive from cells collected from a fetus nearly 50 years ago, were also used for testing the rubella vaccine, the state said.

“The presence of a single, limited medical exemption to a vaccine requirement does not require the State to provide a blanket religious exemption from vaccination,” they said in their written submissions. 

Writing for the three dissenters, Thomas said confusion remains about a mandate like New York’s that provides no religious exemption. He said the court should have taken the case now to head off similar confusion in the future. 

Last December, the Supreme Court declined to temporarily block the vaccine requirement in the case. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said then that the court should have granted the request to put the mandate on hold.   

Since last fall, the court has declined to block other vaccine mandates that don’t provide for religious exemptions, applying to New York teachers, Navy sailors, health care workers in Maine and Massachusetts, and college students in Indiana.



Source

Abortion pill makers brace for restrictions a year after Trump’s election
Health

Abortion pill makers brace for restrictions a year after Trump’s election

Mifepristone and Misoprostol pills are pictured Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2018, in Skokie, Illinois. Erin Hooley | Chicago Tribune | Tribune News Service | Getty Images Just over a year since Donald Trump was elected president again, the $6.9 billion abortion pill industry is operating under the same federal rules he inherited from former President Joe […]

Read More
Republicans push Obamacare tax credit alternatives as enrollment deadline looms
Health

Republicans push Obamacare tax credit alternatives as enrollment deadline looms

An Obamacare sign is displayed outside an insurance agency on Nov. 12, 2025 in Miami, Florida. Joe Raedle | Getty Images With enhanced Obamacare tax credits set to expire at the end of the year, Republicans are proposing new alternatives aimed at lowering the cost of health care. Their window for doing so is rapidly […]

Read More
Novo Nordisk shares plunge 10% after Alzheimer’s drug trial fails to hit key target
Health

Novo Nordisk shares plunge 10% after Alzheimer’s drug trial fails to hit key target

The Novo Nordisk A/S headquarters in Bagsvaerd, Denmark, on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025. Nichlas Pollier | Bloomberg | Getty Images Shares of Novo Nordisk on Monday fell as much 11% after the Danish drug pharmaceutical company said a highly-anticipated trial for Alzheimer’s disease failed to meet its main goal. The trial tested whether semaglutide — the […]

Read More