Supreme Court says Boston should have allowed Christian flag on city property

Supreme Court says Boston should have allowed Christian flag on city property


A man holds a flag he describes as “The Christian Flag.” Right-wing Proud Boy and Patriot Prayer adherents, “Three-Percenters”, and other armed allies of the extreme right demonstrated at Portland, Oregon’s Justice Center on August 22, 2020.

John Rudoff | AP

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that Boston violated the Constitution when it refused to fly an explicitly Christian flag outside city hall.

The court ruled that since the city government had allowed other citizens to use the flagpole to express a variety of messages, its rejection of the cross-bearing flag violated the free-speech rights of the religious group that proposed it.

“Boston’s flag-raising program does not express government speech,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in the opinion of the court, which reversed a lower court’s judgment.

The dispute hinged on the question of whether the flags being flown under the city hall program were expressing the government’s viewpoint, or whether the flagpole had been opened up to citizens to express themselves.

Boston has since 2005 allowed dozens of flags to be flown on one of the three flagpoles outside city hall, some of which expressed the views of private groups or causes. The city had not denied any requests — until 2017, when the director of a group called Camp Constitution asked to fly a flag honoring the “contributions of the Christian community.”

The blue-and-white flag prominently bears a solid-red Christian cross. A city commissioner rejected the Christian flag, fearing that it might run afoul of the Constitution’s prohibition on a government establishment of religion.

A federal district court and a federal appeals court sided with Boston, holding that the flags being flown from the city-hall flagpole amounted to government speech.

The high court, however, looked at “the extent to which Boston actively controlled these flag raisings and shaped the messages the flags sent,” Breyer wrote.

“The answer, it seems, is not at all,” his opinion said. “And that is the most salient feature of this case.”

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.



Source

Trump on Democrats’ election blowout: ‘I don’t think it was good for Republicans’
Politics

Trump on Democrats’ election blowout: ‘I don’t think it was good for Republicans’

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a breakfast with Republican Senators at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. November 5, 2025. Kevin Lamarque | Reuters President Donald Trump conceded that the Democrats’ electoral sweep up and down the ballot across the country on Tuesday night spelled bad news for his Republican Party. “Last night, […]

Read More
Supreme Court hears Trump tariff case on Wednesday with broad trade policy at stake
Politics

Supreme Court hears Trump tariff case on Wednesday with broad trade policy at stake

U.S. Supreme Court Police stand behind security barriers in front of the Court building, which is obscured in construction scaffolding, on the first day of the Court’s new term on October 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Supreme Court on Wednesday morning will hear oral arguments to decide the fate […]

Read More
Democrats make clean sweep in three biggest U.S. elections on Tuesday night
Politics

Democrats make clean sweep in three biggest U.S. elections on Tuesday night

Zohran Mamdani, Democratic candidate for mayor speaks during a press conference celebrating his primary victory with leaders and members of the city’s labor unions on July 2, 2025 in New York. Angela Weiss | Afp | Getty Images Democrats made a clean sweep in the three biggest contested elections in the United States on Tuesday […]

Read More