Supreme Court docket justices were questioned in probe of abortion ruling leak, investigator claims

Supreme Court docket justices were questioned in probe of abortion ruling leak, investigator claims


Anti-abortion demonstrators take component in the annual “March for Lifestyle” for the very first time considering that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade abortion determination, in Washington, January 20, 2023.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Each individual of the Supreme Court’s justices have been questioned — some numerous situations — as section of an investigation into very last year’s leak of a draft belief of the ruling that ended up overturning the court’s landmark Roe v. Wade abortion selection, the head of that probe disclosed Friday.

The assertion arrived a day just after the Supreme Courtroom refused to say whether or not the justices were being between the nearly 100 courtroom staffers and clerks who had been questioned in the probe. That investigation unsuccessful to detect the person or individuals who leaked the draft feeling by Justice Samuel Alito to Politico in May.

None of the justices or their spouses were being determined as opportunity suspects, in accordance to Gail Curley, the marshal of the Supreme Courtroom, who oversaw the leak probe.

But as opposed to other individuals interviewed, none of the justices was asked to give a sworn affidavit denying they leaked the Alito feeling, Curley explained in a assertion.

Alito wrote the June ruling that tossed out the Supreme’s Court docket 5-ten years-aged final decision in Roe v. Wade, which had founded there was a constitutional right to abortion.

CNBC Politics

Go through additional of CNBC’s politics protection:

“For the duration of the course of the investigation, I spoke with every of the Justices, various on many occasions,” Curley reported in a assertion.

“The Justices actively cooperated in this iterative procedure, asking concerns and answering mine,” Curley said. “I followed up on all credible prospects, none of which implicated the Justices or their spouses. On this basis, I did not feel that it was vital to request the Justices to indicator sworn affidavits.”

The courtroom has 9 justices, eight of whom have been serving at the time of the abortion ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer retired just after the ruling was unveiled. CNBC has questioned a court docket spokesman regardless of whether Breyer was among these interviewed by Curley.

Curley’s report on her failure to establish the leaker, which was launched Thursday, did not mention that she had questioned the justices.

The report did say Curley’s team “done 126 official interviews of 97 workers, all of whom denied disclosing the viewpoint.”

Just about every of individuals personnel was asked to signal a sworn affidavit denying they disclosed the draft view.

This is breaking news. Check out back for updates.



Supply

‘The revisions are hard evidence’: White House struggles to justify firing of BLS chief over weak jobs numbers
Politics

‘The revisions are hard evidence’: White House struggles to justify firing of BLS chief over weak jobs numbers

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett speaks with reporters in the driveway outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., March 19, 2025.  Kevin Lamarque | Reuters National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Sunday defended President Donald Trump’s sudden decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, without citing […]

Read More
Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation’s capital
Politics

Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation’s capital

Jeanine Pirro is sworn in as the new interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia during a ceremony hosted by U.S. President Donald Trump, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 28, 2025. Leah Millis | Reuters The Senate has confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor […]

Read More
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Politics

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court’s temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a […]

Read More