Juul asks court for temporary block on FDA’s ban of its e-cigarettes

Juul asks court for temporary block on FDA’s ban of its e-cigarettes


Juul brand vape cartridges are pictured for sale at a shop in Atlanta, Georgia.

Elijah Nouvelage | Reuters

Juul asked a federal appeals court on Friday to block the Food and Drug Administration’s ban on its e-cigarettes temporarily.

The request came less than a day after the health agency told the company that it had to pull its vaping products off the U.S. market, effective immediately. According to the FDA, Juul’s applications to keep selling its vaping device and menthol- and tobacco-flavored nicotine pods gave insufficient or conflicting data about the potential risks of using the company’s products.

Juul disagreed, saying in a statement that it provided sufficient research and evidence to address the issues raised by the agency. The company’s chief regulatory officer, Joe Murillo, said in a statement on Thursday that Juul is exploring its options, which include appealing the decision or engaging with the FDA.

In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Juul asked for an emergency administrative stay until it can file a motion for a stay pending review by noon on Monday. If granted, the company and retailers would be able to keep distributing and selling Juul products until the court reviews the agency’s decision.

“[Juul’s] only prospect for meaningful relief that permits it to continue selling its products is an immediate stay,” the company said in the filing.

Juul claimed that the FDA subjected it to unfair treatment compared with other e-cigarette makers. According to the filing, the agency’s press release announcing its ruling on Juul products was “more strident and threatening” than previous denials.

“FDA’s decision is arbitrary and capricious and lacks substantial evidence, and an immediate administrative stay is critical to protect JLI, its commercial partners, and its customers,” Juul said.

The company also called out the agency for imposing immediate enforcement, rather than instating a transition period, which is typical unless the product poses an immediate risk to consumers.

The FDA declined to comment.



Source

Eli Lilly investors shouldn’t sweat rival Novo Nordisk having the first obesity pill on sale
Health

Eli Lilly investors shouldn’t sweat rival Novo Nordisk having the first obesity pill on sale

Jim Cramer says don’t sweat Novo Nordisk’s head start over Club holding Eli Lilly in the obesity pill market. Eli Lilly stock slipped about half a percent this morning, while Novo Nordisk shares surged more than 8% after becoming the first to secure FDA approval for a GLP-1 weight-loss pill. “[Novo] got approval ahead of […]

Read More
FDA approves first GLP-1 pill for obesity from Wegovy maker Novo Nordisk
Health

FDA approves first GLP-1 pill for obesity from Wegovy maker Novo Nordisk

The logo of pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk is displayed in front of its offices in Bagsvaerd, on the outskirts of Copenhagen, Denmark, Nov. 24, 2025. Tom Little | Reuters The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday approved the first-ever GLP-1 pill for obesity from Wegovy maker Novo Nordisk, a landmark decision that health experts […]

Read More
UnitedHealth Group commits to improvements after independent audit, patient backlash
Health

UnitedHealth Group commits to improvements after independent audit, patient backlash

UnitedHealthcare sign is displayed at its office building in Minnetonka, Minnesota, U.S., Dec. 11, 2025. Tim Evans | Reuters UnitedHealth Group on Friday released the first results from a sprawling independent audit of its business practices and committed to a wide range of steps to track and implement improvements in three specific areas. The health-care […]

Read More