Juul asks court for temporary block on FDA’s ban of its e-cigarettes

Juul asks court for temporary block on FDA’s ban of its e-cigarettes


Juul brand vape cartridges are pictured for sale at a shop in Atlanta, Georgia.

Elijah Nouvelage | Reuters

Juul asked a federal appeals court on Friday to block the Food and Drug Administration’s ban on its e-cigarettes temporarily.

The request came less than a day after the health agency told the company that it had to pull its vaping products off the U.S. market, effective immediately. According to the FDA, Juul’s applications to keep selling its vaping device and menthol- and tobacco-flavored nicotine pods gave insufficient or conflicting data about the potential risks of using the company’s products.

Juul disagreed, saying in a statement that it provided sufficient research and evidence to address the issues raised by the agency. The company’s chief regulatory officer, Joe Murillo, said in a statement on Thursday that Juul is exploring its options, which include appealing the decision or engaging with the FDA.

In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Juul asked for an emergency administrative stay until it can file a motion for a stay pending review by noon on Monday. If granted, the company and retailers would be able to keep distributing and selling Juul products until the court reviews the agency’s decision.

“[Juul’s] only prospect for meaningful relief that permits it to continue selling its products is an immediate stay,” the company said in the filing.

Juul claimed that the FDA subjected it to unfair treatment compared with other e-cigarette makers. According to the filing, the agency’s press release announcing its ruling on Juul products was “more strident and threatening” than previous denials.

“FDA’s decision is arbitrary and capricious and lacks substantial evidence, and an immediate administrative stay is critical to protect JLI, its commercial partners, and its customers,” Juul said.

The company also called out the agency for imposing immediate enforcement, rather than instating a transition period, which is typical unless the product poses an immediate risk to consumers.

The FDA declined to comment.



Source

Shares of breast cancer therapy developer Olema Pharmaceutical could more than double from here
Health

Shares of breast cancer therapy developer Olema Pharmaceutical could more than double from here

Wall Street is optimistic that Olema Pharmaceutical could be developing the next major breakthrough breast cancer treatment. Earlier this month, the company announced promising clinical data for its lead candidate palazestrant, an oral medication that is being evaluated in several trials for estrogen receptor-positive, or ER+, breast cancer. Shares of the clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company are up […]

Read More
This biotech stock has jumped nearly 50% in 3 months. Its CEO says business is ‘growing substantially’
Health

This biotech stock has jumped nearly 50% in 3 months. Its CEO says business is ‘growing substantially’

It’s been a stellar few months for shares of San Francisco-based biotech company Rigel Pharmaceuticals, which has approved treatments for rheumatology and oncology — as well as potential new drugs in the pipeline. The stock has jumped about 50% in just the last three months, earning it a spot on CNBC’s list of top performing […]

Read More
We’re raising our Eli Lilly price target — what a difference a quarter makes
Health

We’re raising our Eli Lilly price target — what a difference a quarter makes

Eli Lilly shares jumped Thursday after the drugmaker posted a strong third quarter, driven by sales of its popular GLP-1 medications. The company also raised its full-year sales outlook for the second time in a row, inspiring confidence in the trajectory of the franchise. Revenue in the three months ended Sept. 30 jumped 54% year […]

Read More