Aussie firms Soul Patts and Brickworks’ $9 billion merger sends their shares rocketing

Aussie firms Soul Patts and Brickworks’  billion merger sends their shares rocketing


The Washington H Soul Pattinson logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen.

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Stocks of Australian investment firm Washington H. Soul Pattinson, also known as Soul Patts, and its affiliate Brickworks surged after both companies announced a A$14 billion ($9 billion) merger.

Shares of Soul Patts traded 13.78% higher, while Brickworks, Australia’s largest brickmaker, jumped 22.32% as of 1 p.m. local time.

As part of the deal, a new company listed in Sydney will acquire all outstanding shares of Soul Patts and Brickworks. The merged entity is projected to be worth around $9 billion, with holdings across real estate, private equity, and credit totaling A$13.1 billion.

“Merging Soul Patts with Brickworks makes a lot of strategic and financial sense,” Soul Patts CEO and Managing Director, Todd Barlow, said in a statement. He added that the deal “simplifies the structure, adds scale, and creates a more investable company.”

The merger will unwind a 56-year mutual ownership that was designed to fend off hostile takeovers and promote long-term investment strategies. Soul Patts owns 43% of Brickworks, while the brickmaker has a 26% stake in Soul Patts. However, critics argued that it suppressed shareholder value and corporate transparency.

Brickworks shareholders are set to receive an implied value of A$30.28 per share, reflecting a 10.1% premium over the stock’s closing price last Friday.

Pitt Capital Partners is acting as adviser to Soul Pattinson, and Citigroup Global Markets Australia is advising Brickworks.

The merger follows several unsuccessful attempts to unwind the cross-shareholding between Soul Patts and Brickworks, including a concerted effort by Perpetual Investment Management and venture capitalist Mark Carnegie between 2012 and 2017, which was dismissed after the Federal Court ruled that the structure was not detrimental to shareholders.

“The structure [was] odd, set up in 1969 as a share swap between two companies with similar market caps to protect against each other being taken over,” said Hugh Dive, chief investment officer of Atlas Funds.

“Historically, we have avoided both as the cross holdings/complicated structure saw both companies trade at a discount to their peers,” Dive added.

While the move is not significant in terms of the M&A scene in Australia, the investors “clearly like it,” he said, pointing to the share move.



Source

Musk torches Trump budget bill: ‘Disgusting abomination’
World

Musk torches Trump budget bill: ‘Disgusting abomination’

Elon Musk speaks during a press event with U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured), at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025. Nathan Howard | Reuters Elon Musk on Tuesday tore into the massive tax-and-spending-cut bill backed by President Donald Trump, calling it a “disgusting abomination” that will explode federal budget deficits. […]

Read More
Meta signs nuclear power deal with Constellation Energy
World

Meta signs nuclear power deal with Constellation Energy

Meta has signed a 20-year agreement to buy nuclear power from Constellation Energy, continuing the wave of tech giants teaming up with the industry in order to meet the growing power needs of data centers. Beginning in June 2027, Meta will buy roughly 1.1 gigawatts of energy from Constellation’s Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois, […]

Read More
UK growth to be reined in by public finance squeeze, OECD warns
World

UK growth to be reined in by public finance squeeze, OECD warns

Considered the home of theatre in London this view is looking from Piccadilly Circus Doug Armand | Stone | Getty Images U.K. economic growth is expected to be stifled by an ongoing squeeze on the country’s public finances, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said on Tuesday. The U.K. is expected to grow […]

Read More