Supreme Court says Boston should have allowed Christian flag on city property

Supreme Court says Boston should have allowed Christian flag on city property


A man holds a flag he describes as “The Christian Flag.” Right-wing Proud Boy and Patriot Prayer adherents, “Three-Percenters”, and other armed allies of the extreme right demonstrated at Portland, Oregon’s Justice Center on August 22, 2020.

John Rudoff | AP

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that Boston violated the Constitution when it refused to fly an explicitly Christian flag outside city hall.

The court ruled that since the city government had allowed other citizens to use the flagpole to express a variety of messages, its rejection of the cross-bearing flag violated the free-speech rights of the religious group that proposed it.

“Boston’s flag-raising program does not express government speech,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in the opinion of the court, which reversed a lower court’s judgment.

The dispute hinged on the question of whether the flags being flown under the city hall program were expressing the government’s viewpoint, or whether the flagpole had been opened up to citizens to express themselves.

Boston has since 2005 allowed dozens of flags to be flown on one of the three flagpoles outside city hall, some of which expressed the views of private groups or causes. The city had not denied any requests — until 2017, when the director of a group called Camp Constitution asked to fly a flag honoring the “contributions of the Christian community.”

The blue-and-white flag prominently bears a solid-red Christian cross. A city commissioner rejected the Christian flag, fearing that it might run afoul of the Constitution’s prohibition on a government establishment of religion.

A federal district court and a federal appeals court sided with Boston, holding that the flags being flown from the city-hall flagpole amounted to government speech.

The high court, however, looked at “the extent to which Boston actively controlled these flag raisings and shaped the messages the flags sent,” Breyer wrote.

“The answer, it seems, is not at all,” his opinion said. “And that is the most salient feature of this case.”

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.



Source

Three things to know about FISA Section 702: Congress passes short-term extension of controversial surveillance program
Politics

Three things to know about FISA Section 702: Congress passes short-term extension of controversial surveillance program

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., speaks as U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer testifies before a Senate Finance Committee hearing on President Donald Trump’s trade policy, on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 8, 2025. Kevin Mohatt | Reuters The House and Senate on Friday approved a short-term extensive of a section of federal law that allows the […]

Read More
House Dem Sam Liccardo probes suspicious oil trades during Iran war
Politics

House Dem Sam Liccardo probes suspicious oil trades during Iran war

Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-Calif., attends a news conference with members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus during the House Democrats’ 2025 Issues Conference at the Lansdowne Resort in Leesburg, Virginia, March 13, 2025. Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-Calif., is probing whether the nation’s top financial regulators are examining […]

Read More
Trump says war in Iran is going ‘swimmingly’ and ‘should be ending pretty soon’
Politics

Trump says war in Iran is going ‘swimmingly’ and ‘should be ending pretty soon’

President Donald Trump on Thursday said that “the war in Iran is going along swimmingly.” “It should be ending pretty soon,” Trump said at an event in Las Vegas, echoing similarly rosy predictions about the end of the war that he has made since the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran in late […]

Read More