

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was a “Lehman moment” for the know-how business, according to a top rated Goldman Sachs dealmaker.
Cliff Marriott, co-head of technology, media and telecoms in Europe for the financial investment banking division of Goldman Sachs, claimed that the March 10 shutdown of SVB was “very annoying,” as the lender’s clientele scrambled to determine out how they would make payroll.
“That initially weekend was a tiny bit like the Lehman moment for engineering and it was truly additional operational for individuals companies,” Marriott advised CNBC’s Arjun Kharpal.
“They necessary obtain to capital. A good deal of their balances ended up on SVB. And, secondly, SVB was propelling and generating a lot of their payments for payroll to spend their staff.”
Founded in 1983, SVB was regarded a trustworthy resource of funding for tech startups and venture cash companies. A subsidiary of SVB Economical Group, the California-dependent industrial loan company was, at a person issue, the 16th largest bank in the U.S. and the most significant in Silicon Valley by deposits.
SVB was taken around by the U.S. governing administration immediately after its clientele of venture capitalists and tech startups withdrew billions from their accounts. Numerous VCs experienced suggested portfolio companies to pull cash on the again of fears that the loan company may well crumble.
SVB Economical Group’s holdings — belongings these kinds of as U.S. Treasury bills and authorities-backed mortgage loan securities that ended up seen as harmless — had been hit by the Fed’s aggressive interest level hikes, and their benefit dropped significantly.

Before this thirty day period, the agency uncovered it experienced marketed $21 billion value of its securities at a around $1.8 billion loss and reported it required to elevate $2.25 billion to meet clients’ withdrawal needs and fund new lending.
The upcoming of SVB continues to be uncertain, even although deposits have been in the end backstopped by the authorities and SVB’s authorities-appointed CEO attempted to reassure consumers that the bank remained open up for business.
Marriott said that there is “even now a massive question mark pertaining to what financial institution or business or set of firms is going to switch SVB in conditions of offering all those utility-like services for technology, providing them bank accounts, making it possible for them to make payroll, keeping their funds balances.”
The SVB collapse has also raised questions more than the likely consequences for other banking companies, with SVB remaining far from the only lender that has arrive underneath pressure. Swiss expenditure banking titan Credit rating Suisse was rescued by its main rival UBS in a authorities-backed, minimize-price deal previous week.
Marriott also addressed tech IPOs and their outlook for 2023. Europe’s tech IPO market has been mainly shut owing to a confluence of sector pressures, including increased curiosity rates, which make the long term cashflows of significant-development tech firms fewer eye-catching.
Marriott stated that he would have been much more optimistic about a recovery in tech IPO exercise two weeks ago.
“I’m however hopeful that we are going to see tech IPO exercise in 2023. And if we do not, I think 2024 will be a huge year for tech IPOs,” Marriott explained.
“I think what we’ll see is the additional set up profitable firms occur first, so the a lot easier to recognize business enterprise styles, profitable firms, before we see the really highly valued profit or adverse revenue organizations that we observed in 2021.”
Check out: ‘Sea of sameness’: Are smartphone makers out of thoughts?
